Understanding the Health Risks of PFAS in Tap Water: An Evidence-Based Approach

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have emerged as a significant public health concern due to their pervasive presence in the environment, particularly in drinking water. These synthetic chemicals, such as PFAS, PFOA, and PFOS, are commonly found in products like non-stick cookware, water-repellent fabrics, and stain-resistant carpets for their water- and stain-resistant properties. These chemicals are commonly known as "forever chemicals" due to their persistence in the environment and the human body and have been detected in water supplies worldwide (Ding, 2020). The growing body of research on PFAS suggests that these substances may pose serious health risks, such as cancer, liver damage, and immune system disruption (Brunn, 2023), warranting increased public awareness and proactive measures to reduce exposure.

Research has increasingly shown that exposure to PFAS can lead to a variety of adverse health effects (Brunn, 2023). These compounds have been linked to:

1. Endocrine Disruption: PFAS can interfere with hormone function, potentially leading to thyroid disorders and other endocrine-related conditions (Lee, 2017).

2. Immune System Suppression: PFAS exposure may weaken the immune system, reducing the body's ability to fight infections and respond to vaccines (Bline, 2024).

3. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity: PFAS exposure can harm reproductive health, leading to complications such as reduced fertility, preterm birth, and developmental issues in children (Rickard, 2022).

4. Cancer Potential: Studies have found associations between PFAS exposure and increased risks of kidney and testicular cancers (Bline, 2024).

5. Metabolic Disorders: PFAS have also been implicated in the development of metabolic disorders, including obesity and diabetes (Dundar, 2023).

6. Liver Function: PFAS have been found to affect liver health, potentially leading to liver disease or elevated liver enzyme levels (Zhang, 2023).

7. Cholesterol: Exposure to PFAS has been linked to higher cholesterol levels, which may increase the risk of heart disease (Anderson, 2021).

PFAS contamination in tap water has become a major public health issue, particularly in areas near industrial sites, military bases, and firefighting training facilities where PFAS-containing foams have been used. According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG) (EWG, 2023), it is estimated that over 200 million Americans may have PFAS in their drinking water at levels that exceed safety thresholds.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set health advisory levels for PFOA and PFOS, two of the most well-known PFAS, at 70 parts per trillion (ppt) in drinking water. (EPA, 2016) However, some experts argue that even these levels may not be safe, especially with long-term exposure. Studies have detected PFAS in water supplies across the United States at concentrations much higher than these advisory levels, raising concerns about the potential health impacts on communities (Berthold, 2023).

Reducing exposure to PFAS is a key step in minimizing potential health risks.

• Filter tap water: Utilize water filters specifically designed to remove PFAS, such as activated carbon filters or reverse osmosis systems (Patterson, 2019).

• Select PFAS-free products: Choose items labeled as PFAS-free, including non-stick cookware and water-resistant textiles (Cousins, 2020).

• Reduce fast food consumption: Be mindful of fast food packaging, which may contain PFAS chemicals (Seltenrich, 2020).

• Stay informed about contaminated areas: Keep up-to-date with local environmental reports and avoid areas with known PFAS contamination, like certain industrial sites (Brusseau, 2020).

• Opt for alternatives to non-stick cookware: Consider using stainless steel or cast iron cookware instead of non-stick pans that may contain PFAS (Sunderland, 2019).

• Avoid stain-resistant treatments: Steer clear of products with stain-resistant treatments on carpets, furniture, and clothing (Sunderland, 2019).

One effective method is the use of water filtration systems designed to remove PFAS from tap water. Technologies such as activated carbon filters and reverse osmosis have been shown to significantly reduce PFAS concentrations (Tow, 2022). Filtration is important for drinking and cooking water as well as water for bathing and showering, since chemicals like PFAS can be absorbed through the skin or aerosolized and breathed in.

For example, the Weddell Duo, a water filtration system that combines activated carbon and ion exchange technology, is one such option that has demonstrated efficacy in reducing PFAS levels in tap water for showering. While the specific choice of filtration system will depend on individual needs and water quality, investing in a reliable water filter can be a proactive measure to protect health.

Q: How can PFAS be detected in tap water?

A: PFAS can be detected in tap water through specialized laboratory testing. Some states and local health departments offer testing services, or private testing can be arranged through certified laboratories.

Q: Are all water filters effective in removing PFAS?

A: Not all water filters are designed to remove PFAS. Look for filters that specifically mention their effectiveness against PFAS, such as those using activated carbon or reverse osmosis technology.

Q: Can PFAS be completely removed from the body?

A: PFAS are persistent chemicals that accumulate in the body over time. While the body can gradually eliminate some PFAS, the process is slow, so reducing exposure is the best strategy to minimize health risks.

The widespread presence of PFAS in the environment, including in tap water, poses significant public health challenges, given the growing evidence linking these chemicals to various adverse health effects. Understanding the risks and taking steps to mitigate exposure, particularly through water filtration, is essential for safeguarding long-term health. Continued research and public awareness are needed to address this complex environmental issue and ensure safer drinking water for all.

We extend our sincere thanks to Dr. Jennifer Weinberg for her valuable contribution to this post and for sharing her expertise on water quality and health.

1. Ding, N., Harlow, S. D., Randolph, J. F., Jr, Loch-Caruso, R., & Park, S. K. (2020). Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their effects on the ovary. Human Reproduction Update, 26(5), 724–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa018

2. Brunn, H., Arnold, G., Körner, W., Rippen, G., Steinhäuser, K. G., & Valentin, I. (2023). PFAS: forever chemicals—persistent, bioaccumulative and mobile. Reviewing the status and the need for their phase out and remediation of contaminated sites. Environmental Sciences Europe, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00721-8

3. Sunderland, E. M., Hu, X. C., Dassuncao, C., Tokranov, A. K., Wagner, C. C., & Allen, J. G. (2019). A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 29(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0094-1

4. Lee, J. E., & Choi, K. (2017). Perfluoroalkyl substances exposure and thyroid hormones in humans: epidemiological observations and implications. Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, 22(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2017.22.1.6

5. Bline, A. P., DeWitt, J. C., Kwiatkowski, C. F., Pelch, K. E., Reade, A., & Varshavsky, J. R. (2024). Public Health Risks of PFAS-Related Immunotoxicity Are Real. Current Environmental Health Reports, 11(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-024-00441-y

6. Rickard, B. P., Rizvi, I., & Fenton, S. E. (2022). Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and female reproductive outcomes: PFAS elimination, endocrine-mediated effects, and disease. Toxicology, 465, 153031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2021.153031

7. Dunder, L., Salihovic, S., Elmståhl, S., Lind, P. M., & Lind, L. (2023). Associations between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and diabetes in two population-based cohort studies from Sweden. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 33(5), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00529-x

8. Zhang, X., Zhao, L., Ducatman, A., Deng, C., von Stackelberg, K. E., Danford, C. J., & Zhang, X. (2023). Association of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance exposure with fatty liver disease risk in US adults. JHEP Reports: Innovation in Hepatology, 5(5), 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100694

9. Andersen, M. E., Hagenbuch, B., Apte, U., Corton, J. C., Fletcher, T., Lau, C., Roth, W. L., Staels, B., Vega, G. L., Clewell, H. J., 3rd, & Longnecker, M. P. (2021). Why is elevation of serum cholesterol associated with exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in humans? A workshop report on potential mechanisms. Toxicology, 459, 152845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2021.152845

10. Environmental Working Group. (2023, November 1). New EPA data show millions more have forever chemicals in drinking water. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news-release/2023/11/new-epa-data-show-millions-more-have-forever-chemicals-drinking

11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016, May 31). Drinking water health advisories for PFOA and PFOS [PDF file]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-06/documents/drinkingwaterhealthadvisories_pfoa_pfos_updated_5.31.16.pdf

12. Berthold, T. A., McCrary, A., deVilleneuve, S., & Schramm, M. (2023). Let's talk about PFAS: Inconsistent public awareness about PFAS and its sources in the United States. PloS one, 18(11), e0294134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294134

13. Patterson, C., Burkhardt, J., Schupp, D., Krishnan, E. R., Dyment, S., Merritt, S., Zintek, L., & Kleinmaier, D. (2019). Effectiveness of point-of-use/point-of-entry systems to remove per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from drinking water. AWWA Water Science, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1131

14. Cousins, I. T., Goldenman, G., Herzke, D., Lohmann, R., Miller, M., Ng, C. A., Patton, S., Scheringer, M., Trier, X., Vierke, L., Wang, Z., & DeWitt, J. C. (2019). The concept of essential use for determining when uses of PFASs can be phased out. Environmental Science. Processes & Impacts, 21(11), 1803–1815. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9em00163h

15. Seltenrich N. (2020). PFAS in Food Packaging: A Hot, Greasy Exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128(5), 54002. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6335

16. Brusseau, M. L., Anderson, R. H., & Guo, B. (2020). PFAS concentrations in soils: Background levels versus contaminated sites. The Science of the Total Environment, 740, 140017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140017

17. Tow, E. W., Ersan, M. S., Kum, S., Lee, T., Speth, T. F., Owen, C., Bellona, C., Nadagouda, M. N., Mikelonis, A. M., Westerhoff, P., Mysore, C., Frenkel, V. S., deSilva, V., Walker, W. S., Safulko, A. K., & Ladner, D. A. (2021). Managing and treating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in membrane concentrates. AWWA Water Science, 3(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1233